[windup-dev] Let's use relative paths

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

I agree that relative paths are a good idea. +1


On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I suggest we use relative paths.
> For the reports, using full paths may get overly verbose and make the
> reports unreadable.
> Relative paths are usually not, that much.
> Compare e.g.:
>
>       INFO: Unzipping
>
> /home/ondra/work/Migration/Windup/tests/core/target/../../../test-files/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
> to
>
> /home/ondra/work/Migration/Windup/tests/core/target/windupreport/archives/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
>
> vs.
>
>      INFO: Unzipping ../../../test-files/Windup1x-javaee-example.war to
> windupreport/archives/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
>
> The base path may be stated just once somewhere else.
>
>  From my experience, using relative paths may get tricky, needing to
> carry the base path(s) along with the relative, but still, is worth the
> work.
>
> my2c,
> Ondra
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>



-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.org
"Simpler is better."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20140811/5a62117f/attachment.html