[windup-dev] Let's use relative paths

Jess Sightler jsightle at redhat.com
Mon Aug 11 10:38:38 EDT 2014


For presentation to the user, I agree. I assume that is what you are 
talking about here?

On 08/10/2014 11:00 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I suggest we use relative paths.
> For the reports, using full paths may get overly verbose and make the
> reports unreadable.
> Relative paths are usually not, that much.
> Compare e.g.:
>
>        INFO: Unzipping
> /home/ondra/work/Migration/Windup/tests/core/target/../../../test-files/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
> to
> /home/ondra/work/Migration/Windup/tests/core/target/windupreport/archives/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
>
> vs.
>
>       INFO: Unzipping ../../../test-files/Windup1x-javaee-example.war to
> windupreport/archives/Windup1x-javaee-example.war
>
> The base path may be stated just once somewhere else.
>
>   From my experience, using relative paths may get tricky, needing to
> carry the base path(s) along with the relative, but still, is worth the
> work.
>
> my2c,
> Ondra
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev



More information about the windup-dev mailing list