[windup-dev] RuleModel et al.

[Ondrej Zizka]

So far, an ID and a reference to the Ruleset. The ruleset then would 
probably have further info, like, version etc.

https://github.com/OndraZizka/windup/blob/3940b146f811ab6e5fff1cb6c6def7179a33a467/reporting/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/windup/reporting/model/RuleModel.java

Anyway, even if it was just an ID, OOP principles suggest to encapsulate 
that ID to a type. My experience agrees. I may be wrong though.

Ondra


On 22.7.2014 02:40, Jess Sightler wrote:
> I'm not opposed to this idea... except that I don't know what a
> "RuleModel" would actually contain, other than the ID.
>
> What are you proposing it to contain?
>
> On 07/21/2014 07:03 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>> We should have $subj:
>>
>> We need to refer to the rules in the report.
>> We agreed to store all information in the graph.
>> Current ID is not guaranteed to be the same over runs.
>> Current ID has no namespaces.
>>
>> my2c.
>> Ondra
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev