[windup-dev] Performance - Forge scanning through Weld
Ondrej Zizka
ozizka at redhat.com
Sun Sep 14 19:30:50 EDT 2014
Are you saying that Furnace change would be needed? I thought Weld
supports Jandex out of the box and transparently. If not, let's keep as
a performance reserve.
Ondra
On 12.9.2014 17:29, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> I would be happy to see an improvement in the furnace-cdi container to
> support this, when we have time to work on it. Right now it's not
> critical, but it would be nice once things settle down after the
> tech-preview release.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com
> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> It seems that Forge spends considerable time (around 10 seconds on my
> laptop) scanning the classes for annotated types;
> Somehow related to
> org.jboss.forge.furnace.container.cdi.impl.ContainerServiceExtension.processRemoteServiceTypes()
>
> This repeats for each test in which Forge is involved.
>
> Could this scanning be sped up using jandex? If we have 40 tests, then
> it would buy us over 5 minutes.
>
> Ondra
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20140915/5181f639/attachment.html
More information about the windup-dev
mailing list