[windup-dev] Performance - Forge scanning through Weld

Ondrej Zizka ozizka at redhat.com
Sun Sep 14 19:30:50 EDT 2014


Are you saying that Furnace change would be needed? I thought Weld 
supports Jandex out of the box and transparently. If not, let's keep as 
a performance reserve.

Ondra



On 12.9.2014 17:29, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> I would be happy to see an improvement in the furnace-cdi container to 
> support this, when we have time to work on it. Right now it's not 
> critical, but it would be nice once things settle down after the 
> tech-preview release.
>
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     It seems that Forge spends considerable time (around 10 seconds on my
>     laptop) scanning the classes for annotated types;
>     Somehow related to
>     org.jboss.forge.furnace.container.cdi.impl.ContainerServiceExtension.processRemoteServiceTypes()
>
>     This repeats for each test in which Forge is involved.
>
>     Could this scanning be sped up using jandex? If we have 40 tests, then
>     it would buy us over 5 minutes.
>
>     Ondra
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     windup-dev mailing list
>     windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20140915/5181f639/attachment.html 


More information about the windup-dev mailing list