[windup-dev] Windup terminology question

[Robb Greathouse]

For the moment the classifications are just place holders until we find something more descriptive.

Robb Greathouse
Chief Evangelist
Middleware Business Unit
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
cellphone 505-507-4906

----- Original Message -----
> 
> On 09/18/2014 05:41 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> > On 18 Sep 2014, at 21:40, Sande Gilda <sgilda at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 09/18/2014 03:58 PM, Pete Muir wrote:
> >>> On 18 Sep 2014, at 19:56, Sande Gilda <sgilda at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ondra and I have created a glossary on the Windup Wiki to document
> >>>> terminology that is used by Windup. The goal is to finalize the correct
> >>>> terms we want to use in Windup and avoid confusion down the road.
> >>>>
> >>>> One of the open issues is whether to describe a "ruleset" (formerly
> >>>> referred to as "rulebase") as a "Forge add-on" or as a "Windup
> >>>> plug-in". Does anyone have a preference?
> >>> I prefer “ruleset” ;-) IOW I don’t think either those are the right
> >>> description.
> >> We already decided on ruleset over rulebase, so I'm glad you agree.
> >>
> >> How should we describe a ruleset? Won't customers be able to create their
> >> own?
> > I would describe a ruleset as a ruleset, or perhaps a “collection rules
> > packaged as a JAR”?
> I like it! Thanks!
> >
> >>>> The glossary page is located here:
> >>>> https://github.com/windup/windup/wiki/Glossary. As you come across
> >>>> other Windup terms, feel free to update the page directly or email/ping
> >>>> me so that we include them on that page.
> >>>>
> >>>> Robb, I included some terms from your presentation and took an educated
> >>>> guess at the meanings. Please let me know if they are incorrect.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Sande
> >>>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>