[windup-dev] Common parent for windup core and windup BOM?

[Jess Sightler]

That sounds worse than maintaining it in two places.

On 01/28/2015 12:32 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
> No, but what we can do is remove the <version.forge> property in the 
> BOM itself, and in the windup-parent POM, and instead specify the 
> version on the command line using -Dversion.forge=2.13.X.Y
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com 
> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     to keep the Forge versions aligned, and generally let those two share
>     some properties, plugin configs, versions etc.,
>
>     we could let them have a common parent. To prevent issues like we were
>     solving now - with <version.forge> differing in those two, causing
>     https://issues.jboss.org/browse/FORGE-2206 .
>
>     Note that it would not mean moving everything under a new directory
>     level - parent can be in a sibling directory.
>
>     WDYT?
>     Ondra
>     _______________________________________________
>     windup-dev mailing list
>     windup-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:windup-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev

-- 
Calendar Free/Busy: https://www.google.com/calendar/embed?src=jsightle%40redhat.com&ctz=America/New_York

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20150128/4d74a18c/attachment.html