[windup-dev] Windup rule IDs scheme

[Ondrej Zizka]

Correct, apologies :) Moving

On 27.5.2015 13:46, Pete Muir wrote:
> Exactly the kind of discussion that *doesn’t* need to be on 
> jboss-migration-team. There is nothing confidential here, probably 
> nothing internal. I would move this to windup-dev…
>
>> On 27 May 2015, at 03:06, Ondrej Zizka <ozizka at redhat.com 
>> <mailto:ozizka at redhat.com>> wrote:
>>
>> (19:45:09) LincolnThree: *ok guys/gal, let's discuss rule ID syntax 
>> (ozizka, jsightler, sgilda)*
>> (19:45:15) LincolnThree: we need a standard
>> (19:45:23) sgilda: yes, we do
>> (19:45:45) LincolnThree: I think we have a few things to consider:
>> (19:45:48) LincolnThree: 1) uniqueness
>> (19:45:51) LincolnThree: 2) descriptiveness
>> (19:45:58) LincolnThree: anything else?
>> (19:46:06) LincolnThree: 3) searchability
>> (19:46:39) LincolnThree: or we can discuss this tomorrow during the 
>> meeting.
>>
>> Sorry, I missed that conversation.
>> My view:
>>
>> 1) Uniqueness, no doubt.
>> 2) Decriptiveness - to a minimal level.  It will be useful when 
>> getting user feedback (bugs, I suspect :)
>>
>> So that when something goes wrong and the user will send the 
>> stacktrace, we will know what rule caused it right away.
>>
>> 3) Searchability - I'd rely on metadata for searches.
>>
>> Additionally, an ID could contain the main source and target technology.
>>
>>
>> E.g.  "weblogic>eap:asynchbeans.Work-6bcvk" for
>>
>>         <rule id="weblogic>eap:asynchbeans.Work-6bcvk">
>>             <when>
>>                 <javaclass 
>> references="com.ibm.websphere.asynchbeans.Work" as="default">
>> <location>INHERITANCE</location>
>>                 </javaclass>
>>             </when>
>>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/windup-dev/attachments/20150527/86a18dd1/attachment.html