[windup-dev] Deps in windup-rules-java-api

Ondrej Zizka ozizka at redhat.com
Tue Apr 19 07:28:02 EDT 2016


There's a difference whether it's in the addon or in the submodule. 
Submodule can have a compile time dependency. Addon should have provided.

The rules for addon pom.xml deps are quite complex, once I wrote down 
what I knew to those pages on wiki, but there are blank spots.
+1 that we could review the deps. At least we would refresh how it 
should be.

Ondra


On 18.4.2016 14:54, Jess Sightler wrote:
> Feel free to try it. "provided" is generally what we would do in those
> cases.
>
> On 04/15/2016 07:02 PM, Ondrej Zizka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've noticed that in the pom.xml of $subj, there is:
>>
>>            <dependency>
>>                <groupId>org.jboss.windup.ast</groupId>
>>                <artifactId>windup-java-ast</artifactId>
>>                <classifier>forge-addon</classifier>
>>                <scope>compile</scope>
>>            </dependency>
>>            <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.jboss.windup.rules.apps</groupId>
>>                <artifactId>windup-rules-base</artifactId>
>>                <classifier>forge-addon</classifier>
>>                <scope>compile</scope>
>>            </dependency>
>>
>>
>> Shouldn't that be of scope provided, and listed in ../addon/pom.xml ?
>>
>> Ondra
>> _______________________________________________
>> windup-dev mailing list
>> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev
> _______________________________________________
> windup-dev mailing list
> windup-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/windup-dev



More information about the windup-dev mailing list