Re: [undertow-dev] Lingering session resources in keepalive

From: "Stuart Douglas" <sdouglas(a)redhat.com&gt; To: "Eric Peters" <epeters(a)epicor.com&gt; Cc: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Friday, 19 June, 2015 10:00:18 AM Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] Lingering session resources in keepalive This was fixed in Undertow 1.2: https://github.com/undertow-io/undertow/commit/ca788df7f550513324f11de d155e71f5f3219aa0 Stuart ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eric Peters" <epeters(a)epicor.com&gt; > To: "Tomaž Cerar" <tomaz.cerar(a)gmail.com&gt; > Cc: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Friday, 19 June, 2015 12:10:12 AM > Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] Lingering session resources in keepalive > > > > I honestly was expecting the answer to that to be Undertow 1.1.4, > but in double-checking I found it’s on Undertow 1.1.0. Time I skim > the patches from > 1.1.0 on up to see if anything could have addressed this. > > > > Honestly, I’ve got two angles here: > > 1) I need a reliable solution which has a minimum of caveats. > Updating in 1.1.x or configuration changes preferred, but if patches > are needed, so be it > > 2) Did we stumble on a shortcoming in Undertow? Honestly, I think > this can be argued both ways. If this has merit as a flaw, I’d like > to get the find to the right people. > > > > //EricP > > > > From: Tomaž Cerar [mailto:tomaz.cerar@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 2:47 PM > To: Eric Peters > Cc: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Subject: Re: [undertow-dev] Lingering session resources in keepalive > > > > > What version of undertow are you using? > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Eric Peters < epeters(a)epicor.com > wrote: > > > We’re still trying to confirm things on our end, so it’s still > possible a wrong assumption’s been made somewhere, but it looks like > session resources are lingering with the http connection after the session has expired. > > > > From one of the heap dumps, following session data that expired the > previous day back to a GC root: > http://imgur.com/Ov8xFy1 > > That’s from a dump where the read-timeout was disabled. > > > > We can set the read-timeout, but I don’t know if the behavior of > keep-alive will limit the impact of the read timeout. After the > reply has been created and sent, do the particulars of the request > or reply need to be kept beyond the expiry of the session they were for? > > > > Is there a way to disable keep-alive? In this particular instance > it’s more important that the resources be freed up timely than it is > that the server use keep-alive to give a boost on performance.. > > > > //EricP > > > > > This message has been scanned for malware by Websense. > www.websense.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > undertow-dev mailing list > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev > > > > > > > > Click here to report this email as spam. > > _______________________________________________ > undertow-dev mailing list > undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev _______________________________________________ undertow-dev mailing list undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev