Re: [undertow-dev] transfer-encoding vs content-length with small response

From: "Edgar Espina" <espina.edgar(a)gmail.com&gt; To: undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org Sent: Tuesday, 10 February, 2015 10:36:20 PM Subject: [undertow-dev] transfer-encoding vs content-length with small response Hi, I know that Undertow figure it out a content-length or transfer-encoding header when none of them was set. That's good and it works as expected. It seems to be a problem when you explicitly set the "Transfer-Encoding" header bc Undertow, still add the Content-Length (on small responses?) but it doesn't remove the Transfer-Encoding header. On such cases, the response contains both headers, which I think it's wrong, no? -- edgar _______________________________________________ undertow-dev mailing list undertow-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/undertow-dev