[aerogear-dev] code formatting

[Lucas Holmquist]

would it be better to put it here or keep both

https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-427



On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> 
> On Sep 13, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Jay Balunas wrote:
> 
>> We should combine this with a general review of our developer coding standards here - https://github.com/aerogear/ide-config
> 
> I still think that ide-config is collateral to a document describing what we use.
> I've opened https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AEROGEAR-435 to track this
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 13, 2012, at 3:14 PM, Douglas Campos wrote:
>> 
>>> I was talking with kris today about JS formatting, and he showed me this [1].
>>> 
>>> Even if I hate some of the proposed styles, having consistency wins over personal preferences, and we don't have decent JS autoformatters, AFAIK.
>>> 
>>> Any objections to following this as our guideline for JS code?
>>> 
>>> [1]:https://github.com/rwldrn/idiomatic.js/
>>> 
>>> -- qmx
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> -- qmx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev