[aerogear-dev] [aerogear-controller] Multipart support

[Matthias Wessendorf]

not only hybrid :) native may want to upload data too :-)


On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com>wrote:

> Nice write up !
> Beside the controller side, and talking about consistency, did our Pipes
> support mutlipart ? A common use case would be a hybrid app that wants to
> upload a picture from the camera, would be really nice if we can do this
> with a Pipe.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Daniel Bevenius <
> daniel.bevenius at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll take a look at what the mapping might look like and post back with a
>> suggestion.
>>
>> >same here, not sure if still (good) maintained, since it (multipart) is
>> now part of the servlet spec;
>> Good point here Matthias. Let me take another look into this and see if
>> we can somehow use the MultipartConfig from the spec. This would have been
>> our first choice, but as far as I know this is not supported from a filter
>> but only when used on a Servlet. I'll see if there is another way to do
>> this.
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback!
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 April 2013 17:50, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Monday, April 15, 2013 10:00:14 AM, Daniel Bevenius wrote:
>>>> > Hi!
>>>> >
>>>> > I've created a gist to discuss possible ways to implement
>>>> > multipart-support in AeroGear Controller:
>>>> > https://gist.github.com/danbev/fec1fe498cabdf0aef6a
>>>> >
>>>> > Any suggestion/comments are welcome.
>>>> >
>>>> > /Dan
>>>> I don't mind relying on commons-fileupload.
>>>>
>>>
>>> same here, not sure if still (good) maintained, since it (multipart) is
>>> now part of the servlet spec;
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It would be nice (but more work) if we could marshall objects with
>>>> multipart like we can with JSON.  For fields which aren't files that is
>>>> easy.  For fields which are files we would have some behavior to define.
>>>>
>>>> I'm all for making easy bindings for common types (maybe byte[], File,
>>>> InputStream, BufferedImage) and having an easy way to inject custom
>>>> processing (perhaps with annotations).
>>>>
>>>
>>> that would be nice, to have an easy mapping
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20130416/33a5f152/attachment-0001.html