[aerogear-dev] Ordering of the icons / technologies

[Kris Borchers]

I think the original order came from the fact that the JS bits were the first to be released. I think listing in alpha order makes sense.

On Aug 13, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Well, IMO iOS should go to the end of the list because it sucks, just
> kidding.
> 
> Agreed about ordering by alphabet.
> 
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I was wondering about something...
>> 
>> the list:
>> * iOS
>> * Android
>> * Web
>> * Hybrid
>> 
>> Not sure, but I *think* some folks may (want) to read that iOS has
>> higher prio over Android, Android over JS/Web etc....
>> 
>> I tend to list by alphabet to avoid those 'discussions' :-)
>> 
>> So my 'politically correct' list would be like:
>> * Android
>> * Hybrid
>> * iOS
>> * Web
>> 
>> 
>> does that make sense - or should we not even worry about those incorrect
>> 'misinterpretations' ? 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>> 
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> 
> -- 
> abstractj
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev