[aerogear-dev] UnifiedPush Server domain model

Bruno Oliveira bruno at abstractj.org
Thu Jun 12 08:17:05 EDT 2014


I would vote to stabilize 0.11.0 before we start to make big changes.

On 2014-06-12, Karel Piwko wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 16:48:07 +0200
> Sebastien Blanc <scm.blanc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm also +1 but maybe better to wait after 0.11 no ?
> >
> Likely, too many things have been changed in 0.11 already ;-)
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 on that!
> > >
> > > Should we do that for the 0.11 ? Or after?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 3:38 PM, Karel Piwko <kpiwko at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 on not having separate table per variant type and using different
> > >> inheritance model here - for instance a discriminator column.
> > >>
> > >> Karel
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, 11 Jun 2014 15:14:21 +0200
> > >> Erik Jan de Wit <edewit at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > Right now the domain model of the UnifiedPush Server has the variants
> > >> split
> > >> > into separate collections.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/api/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/api/PushApplication.java#L44-L50
> > >> >
> > >> > This could be improved to only use one collection, we’ll get more
> > >> > extendibility (adding another variant type for instance) and remove
> > >> code like
> > >> > this:
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> https://github.com/edewit/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/blob/master/model/jpa/src/main/java/org/jboss/aerogear/unifiedpush/jpa/dao/impl/JPAPushApplicationDao.java#L93-L96
> > >> >
> > >> > In places where you only want the iOS variants for instance you could
> > >> either
> > >> > query them, or have a getter that collects them by type.
> > >> >
> > >> > What do you think?
> > >> >
> > >> >       Cheers,
> > >> >               Erik Jan
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev

--

abstractj


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list