[aerogear-dev] UPS UX updates

[Hylke Bons]

On 27/03/2014 14:00, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>
>
>
> great! I'd don't see a huge problem here in pagination of the 
> variatns; I doubt that one PushApp has a gazillion different variants
I don't think it will be a problem either. When variants are going into 
the bazillion numbers there will be many other problems in managing 
apart from pagination. Managing them will practically become impossible.


>
>
>
>
>
>>     The Code Snippets : Yeah A button/link would be needed
>
>     This are the "What's this for?" links. We might want to reconsider
>     the name for that.
>
>
> Now, I open the details of a variant (by clicking on it), and I see 
> the LINK
>
> Clicking on it will give me a "popup" with the different code-snippet 
> (note: we need Cordova + native), per variant, right ?
>
>
>
>
>>
>>         - Sidebar: is that specific to an application? See notes on
>>         "applications.png"
>>         - The "Notifications" on the sidebar, what's that?
>>         - What's the "gear-wheel" for ?
>>
>
>     The gear menu will have contextual actions like "Rename" and
>     "Delete". It's less cluttered than having them as links or icons
>     on every row.
>
>
>
>
> ah!!!  Took a bit to realize that :-)
>
>
>
>
>>
>>         * "dialogs.png"
>>         - For an application construct, that's good enough; Creating
>>         a variant is a bit more complex (see current UI)
>>         - Is there no side bar for this?
>>
>>
>>     I assume that for delete app/variant or reset id/secrets we will
>>     use the same dialogs
>>
>>
>>
>>         * installations.png
>>         - Is there no side bar for this?
>>         - If I understand the view/page correctly, its a list of ALL
>>         installations for one PushApplication. However, we should
>>         list the variants PER variant (see current UI).  The
>>         Navigation path on the bread-crumbs would be "Applications >>
>>         Mobile HR >> Demo (iOS) >> Installations (number)"
>>
>>     +1 but I think that was also Hylke's initial idea  because on the
>>     application details screen you see that the link to installations
>>     is on the  "variant" level. I think it was just a glitch in his
>>     bread-crumbs.
>
>     I wasn't too sure about what we could do here. In some cases it's
>     good to have installations per variant, in others you want to see
>     them per application.
>
>
> for now, I think, let's list them only per variant - feels (for me) a 
> bit more clean
>
I'm fine with that.

>
> Thanks for the reply. I hope we are now all on the same page.
>
> Oh, any chance to get a bit rid of that blue; replacing by a different 
> colour ? :-))
>

This is the blue from patternfly.org, but we can discuss different 
options. What about yellow and black stripes? :P

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20140327/96a47318/attachment.html