[aerogear-dev] Aerogear Website design

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 6:04 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org> wrote:

> Ahoy my friend, answers inline. (my personal opinion)
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Andres Galante <agalante at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, I am starting to redesign auroras.org. I would like your help to
>> understand better the product and our user.
>>
>> Who is the developer that uses Aerogear? is it a hardcore developer, or
>> someone that is looking for a ready made solution?
>>
>
> I think both. We have JavaScript, iOS, Android, Cordova, Firefox and
> JavaEE developers. For example, some Java EE developers don't care about JS
> and they might be looking for a ready made solution (In this situation,
> AeroGear with Forge or JBDS is a good fit).
>
> At the same time you have JS developers for example like Lukas or Luke,
> which are familiar with Java EE, but they are more like a hardcore
> developer and they just want to make use of libraries. Some devs will stick
> make use of tools, others to just our libraries.
>

+1 both are 'target'


>
>
>> I understand that we have 3 products, Core, Push and security. What is
>> our main product?
>>
>
> At the moment, I would say that Push is the main AeroGear focus. Although
> AG is more than just Push. We provide libraries willing to make developer's
> life easy so topics like: Push, Security (cryptography, OAuth2 libraries, 2
> factor), data sync, geo-fencing, offline support...and more crazy and dirty
> things you could possible imagine with fancy devices — probably AG will be
> there.
>

correct. first push release is done. Work for others (e.g.OAuth2 and
data-sync/offline) is in the works.



>
>
>> What is a user he looking for when he gets to Aerogear? How can Aerogear
>> help him?
>>
>
> Most of the developers (others can correct me if I'm wrong) are looking to
> boost their productivity. Let's think about something very complex like
> cryptography or OAuth2, is really hard to newcomers to grok into RFCs and
> implement it. Most part of the time people just want to connect their apps
> to Facebook, Twitter, <put your favorite social network here>. People don't
> have time and sometimes patience to read RFCs and start from scratch
> (because it's boring)
>
> I think this is where AeroGear comes into place. If you talk to Passos, he
> will give to you details about reducing 25% of the hard work on Android
> with AeroGear.
>

Right, both are examples to make life easier. Same goes for push. our
server makes it easier to handle and manage all aspects of push.


>
>
>>
>> At this point I would also like to build a “design persona” to have a
>> coherent identity, voice and styles throughout our line. If aerogear was a
>> person, who would it be? what voice does it have, color, typography, etc.
>>
>
> Amazing. Not sure if AeroGear would be a person, but to me is more like
> Skipper (
> http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130327234948/pixar/images/7/70/Planes_skipper_rollout_final.jpg
> )
>

hehe :)


>
>
>> With this done we will make sure our websites, demos and consoles speak
>> the same language.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> --
> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
> -
> @abstractj
> -
> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141111/5120a23f/attachment.html