[aerogear-dev] UPS server configuration interface?

Sebastien Blanc scm.blanc at gmail.com
Tue Nov 18 05:39:23 EST 2014


On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
wrote:

> Question: What would be the best for you generate an ups-realm.json file
> for download based on the current host or let the developer specify the
> redirect URL?
>
I would say, let's use the current host, like we do when we generate the
code snippets examples.

>
> I'm thinking about it
>
> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/db7639566e75f01a8cc79ff18f22daa61cc9cb30#diff-b8df82f22499b0118c37e0e363c4342aR80
>
>
> On 2014-11-17, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:13 PM, Bruno Oliveira <bruno at abstractj.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Good morning amazing people.
> > >>
> > >> While working on AGPUSH-1047, I was wondering if would make sense on
> > >> having a configuration page before users getting started.
> > >>
> > >
> > > you speak out of my mind, I thought about the same in the train, when I
> > > saw you changes on GH (the URL replacements to KC and KC.js).
> > >
> > > We somehow should have a dialog right after installation, that asks
> > > "default" or "custom" KC server etc
> > >
> >
> > where
> > * default would be -> KC and UPS on same server;
> > custom: Provide URL for KC server
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I thinking about the current problem on decoupling our server from
> > >> Keycloak[1] and OpenShift.
> > >>
> > >> What is the current proposal for the initial setup?
> > >>
> > >> 1. Developer create an UPS instance on OpenShift
> > >> 2. Visit https://myups-abstractj.rhcloud.com/ag-push
> > >> 3. The application automagically redirect to the configuration page
> with
> > >> options to skip or enter the URL for the Keycloak server.
> > >> 4. App changes the keycloak.json/ups-realm.json file based on the URL
> > >> provided.
> > >>
> > >> Does it make sense?
> > >>
> > >
> > > yes, it absolutely does!
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> [1] -
> > >>
> https://github.com/abstractj/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/commit/db7639566e75f01a8cc79ff18f22daa61cc9cb30#diff-f2f2799554171f7ce321785716b71244R3
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> abstractj
> > >> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> aerogear-dev mailing list
> > >> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > >
> > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> >
> > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > aerogear-dev mailing list
> > aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
> --
>
> abstractj
> PGP: 0x84DC9914
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141118/c0090345/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the aerogear-dev mailing list