[aerogear-dev] message format change proposal

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

> 'payload' is the term used for this kind of "in-message custom data"
> since the early years of EIP tools (before camel was born)
>

nested payload, inside of message, I am not sure



>
> Any strong reason to avoid it?
>
> Also, as others pointed out, we have json keys with dashes, is this
> really desired? because consistency :)
>

yeah, we have a few, to stay in sync a/ le apple (action-category and
content-available)




>
>
> --
> qmx
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20141027/d7c10bfc/attachment.html