[aerogear-dev] In which version include Data Sync? 2.0 or 1.x?

[Summers Pittman]

On Friday, September 19, 2014 1:50:33 PM, Daniel Passos wrote:
> Summers you're never wrong :)
>
> BTW, I'm not sure about 2.0 or 2.1, we are in the middle of a BIG
> refactoring for 2.0

Can we make a areogear-android-datasync:0.1 then?

>
> -- Passos
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com
> <mailto:supittma at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 9/19/2014 7:25 AM, Lukáš Fryč wrote:
>>     Hey guys,
>>
>>     on yesterday's Aerogear.js meeting we have discussed in which
>>     version we should include Data Sync module. Since we are starting
>>     works on ES6 compatibility, which is one of the big features for
>>     2.0, it make sense to continue with Data Sync there.
>>
>>     What about Android and iOS SDKs? Do you plan to include new
>>     module in 2.0 or start that in 1.x and later backport to 2.0?
>     It will be part of 2.0.  We don't have any plans to back port this
>     to the 1.x branches of things.
>     Passos, feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
>>
>>
>>     Cheers!
>>
>>     ~ Lukas
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     aerogear-dev mailing list
>>     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org  <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     aerogear-dev mailing list
>     aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev