[aerogear-dev] Dealing with UPS Keycloak data post-datasource-split

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Hi Doug,



On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx at qmx.me> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> back to one schema, for 1.1.0 and do clean separation on 1.2.0?
>>
>
> Worksforme(tm)
>
> +1
>

ok, cool - I'd say - let's do that.

So, since the KC part (e.g. new Keycloak versions), is covered by
themselves, something like this [1] is not a huge issue, right? At least
that's my understanding/assumption.

Related, we already have a vage epic to cover the separation, I have moved
that to 1.2.0

[1] https://github.com/aerogear/aerogear-unifiedpush-server/pull/547
[2] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/AGPUSH-1047



>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20150508/ea591ffc/attachment.html