[aerogear-dev] UPS 1.2.0+ on WF10/JDK8 - should we continue supporting WF8/JDK7?

[Matthias Wessendorf]

Another thing is, Keycloak also is now JDK-8:
https://github.com/keycloak/keycloak/tree/1.8.1.Final#building

(current release is 1.9.1 and 2.0.0-CR1 is in the making)

And one of the JDKs even called Java7 dead, sure... that's not that
important.

I am very supportive of this, especially our main server platforms (WildFly
and EAP) are also Java8 only with the latest releases



On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <matzew at apache.org>
wrote:

> For our work, required for supporting APNs' HTTP/2 APIs we also need JDK-8.
>
> I wonder if we should call the release 2.0.0, and really aim only
> WF10/EAP7 + (Open)JDK-8
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Lukáš Fryč <lukas at fryc.eu> wrote:
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> we are working on delivering some improvements in UPS messaging subsystem
>> in 1.2.0,
>>
>> and part of that is also adoption of WF10 (with ActiveMQ Artemis
>> underneath).
>>
>>
>> The problem is that WF10 is JDK8 only, so if we use it for tests, we are
>> limiting ourselves to JDK8-only build. We could run it on WF8 with JDK7,
>> off course.
>>
>> Question is, do we want to support WF8 with UPS 1.2.0+, or should we
>> switch to WF10 only?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> ~ Lukas
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aerogear-dev mailing list
>> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20160318/915834dc/attachment.html