[aerogear-dev] Refactoring push-network-proxies

[Matthias Wessendorf]

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Jose Miguel Gallas Olmedo <
jgallaso at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I recently create a Docker image of our push FCM proxy, made with
> Wiremock. Since we are no longer using the FCM proxy in
> https://github.com/aerogear/push-network-proxies (even the Dockerfile
> there only consider APNs) I think we could remove it from there and
> refactor the repository like this:
>

not sure if we should delete it yet - I think it was written by QE to test
GCMv2 - but push server is now GCMv3/FCM compliant. I think there is some
features missing there. Perhaps it's still good - not really sure.

But if Wiremock offers what we need -> fine, better to use things that are
supported through a larger community ;-)


>
> push-network-proxies/
>    fcm/
>       Dockerfile
>       ...
>    apns/
>       Dockerfile
>       ...
>    push-network-proxies-template.yml
>
> So that we have everything in the same place. I also made a template for
> Openshift so that we can setup a testing environment for UPS quickly. I
> think that's the ultimate point of having the mocks together.
>

I like that, having this structure, where FCM is based on Wiremock, right?


>
> WDYT?
>
> --
>
> JOSE MIGUEL GALLAS OLMEDO
>
> ASSOCIATE QE, mobile
>
> Red Hat
>
> <https://www.redhat.com/>
>
> M: +34618488633 <http://redhatemailsignature-marketing.itos.redhat.com/>
>
> <https://red.ht/sig>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aerogear-dev mailing list
> aerogear-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/aerogear-dev
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/aerogear-dev/attachments/20170624/9b6db82c/attachment.html