[bv-dev] BVAL-289 renaming methods or follow along

[Gerhard Petracek]

in general:
+0 for deprecations
-1 for renaming (removing) existing apis

regards,
gerhard



2012/5/31 Rich Midwinter <rich.midwinter at gmail.com>

> I'm not convinced the proposed new names are particularly clear at first
> glance, although I'd concede they're a more accurate description.
>
> I'd probably favour the current naming convention.
>
> Rich.
> On May 31, 2012 6:16 AM, "Michael Nascimento" <misterm at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It is not a widely used part of the API and the suggested names make
>> more sense, so I vote for using new consistent names and deprecate the
>> old ones.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Emmanuel Bernard
>> <emmanuel at hibernate.org> wrote:
>> > Can you guys weight in on this issue
>> https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-289
>> >
>> > Emmanuel
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> > beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
>> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20120602/38cee763/attachment.html