[bv-dev] Proposal for supporting new Java 8 date/time types

Christian Kaltepoth christian at kaltepoth.de
Sat Nov 12 05:20:54 EST 2016


Hey Guillaume,

this looks VERY good! I like like the idea of using "orPresent" instead of "
nowIsValid".

Great work!

Christian

2016-11-10 0:29 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Smet <guillaume.smet at gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> So I started to work on a first implementation in the API, the TCK and in
> HV.
>
> It's a bit different from the latest draft of Michael but I think it
> should be a good base for our discussions.
>
> * Bean Validation API: https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation-
> api/pull/70
> * Bean Validation TCK: https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation-
> tck/pull/77
> * HV: https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator/pull/576
>
> Main differences are:
> * I didn't use introspection to build the now object from the Clock and
> get the compareTo method. It would save some code but I don't think it's a
> good idea. I agree that it limits the support to officially supported types
> but I like it better this way. AbstractJavaTimeValidator makes it easy to
> add support for other types if required;
> * I implemented all the default java.time types in this first round but
> I'll add optional support for threeten-extras as a proprietary extension in
> a followup-up patch if we decide to keep this approach;
> * I named the nowIsValid option orPresent leading to having something like
> @Past(orPresent = true) which does not look too bad.
>
> Comments welcome!
>
> --
> Guillaume
>
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Gunnar Morling <gunnar at hibernate.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>>
>> +1 for splitting it up into two parts and have the discussion around
>> Duration et al. separately. Based on that, do you think you could send a PR
>> with the first pieces some time soon?
>>
>> I think it'd be great to put out an Alpha1 of the spec and the RI
>> containing this change and the other things we have so far. It's just the
>> first steps, but pushing it out demonstrates progress and allows to get
>> feedback early on.
>>
>> My idea would be to do an Alpha1 with these changes around the end of
>> this month. WDYT?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Gunnar
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
>



-- 
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://blog.kaltepoth.de/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
GitHub: https://github.com/chkal
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/beanvalidation-dev/attachments/20161112/81f3cc13/attachment.html 


More information about the beanvalidation-dev mailing list