[cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events
mkouba at redhat.com
Thu Dec 8 06:51:34 EST 2016
The sentence "Observers with smaller priority values are called first."
sounds weird. If it were @Order annotation, the sentence would be fine
and natural. But right now, we say that observers with highest priority
are notified last.
By the way, interceptors are different beasts - an interceptor with the
highest priority is "closest" to the bean method invocation, i.e. it's
the last one which can react BEFORE the bean method is invoked and the
first one which can react AFTER the bean invocation returns (and process
Dne 8.12.2016 v 11:45 Matej Novotny napsal(a):
> Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or the other doesn't really make difference to me.
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine at sabot-durand.net>
>> To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM
>> Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events
>> Hi all,
>> As already explained in a previous mail , some of us would like change the
>> current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the
>> lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work
>> (highest value being the first candidate).
>> If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1
>> and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on  but
>> time is running out.
>> Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET.
>> Thanks for your participation.
>>  http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html
>> cdi-dev mailing list
>> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code
>> under the Apache License, Version 2
>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
>> property rights inherent in such information.
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
Red Hat, Czech Republic
More information about the cdi-dev