[cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-527 / PR 271 allow proxying of classes with non-private final methods

Florent Benoit fbenoit at codenvy.com
Sat Feb 13 04:36:46 EST 2016

+1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec

On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <
antoine at sabot-durand.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> There have been a lot of discussion around CDI-527 in the last weeks:
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-527
> Mark proposed a PR:
> https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/271
> But we don't agree on adding this feature to the spec.
> This vote is to decide if we should add this feature at the spec level
> now, or not.
> Should we vote this feature down, that won't mean it will be completely
> dropped: it could be implemented as non portable feature in both Spec or
> even be included as experimental feature in the spec (in annexes) as
> describe in the PR comments
> Vote starts now, only vote from EG members are binding (but you can give
> your opinion if not part of the EG) and will last 72 hours.
> You vote with the following values:
> +1 : I'm favorable for adding this feature in the spec
> -1 : I'm against adding this feature in the spec
> 0 : I don't care
> Thank you for your attention and your vote.
> Antoine Sabot-Durand
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
> code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
> intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160213/a437a240/attachment-0001.html 

More information about the cdi-dev mailing list