[forge-dev] Opinion poll: Jackson vs Errai

[George Gastaldi]

+1 to Errai+JS

Em 21/12/2012, às 19:44, "Lincoln Baxter, III" <lincolnbaxter at gmail.com> escreveu:

> If I were given the choice, I would choose Errai + REST over pure JS + REST. Try maintaining a 100,000+ line javascript app over multiple teams. Good luck!
> 
> 
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:41 PM, Luca Masini <luca.masini.mailing.list at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Pete I think that Thomas is talking about the marshalling protocol used by Errai, you can use its own or one that is "jackson compatible".
>> 
>> I prefere the latter because I use JAX-RS services that produces JSON with Jackson.
>> 
>> Ciao.
>> 
>> 
>> 2012/12/19 Pete Muir <pmuir at redhat.com>
>>> Jackson is a marshalling library for XML and JSON. Errai is a framework for building apps that execute in the browser. I'm not sure you can replace one with the other.
>>> 
>>> On 19 Dec 2012, at 13:55, A-ON Puls Referenz-User wrote:
>>> 
>>> > Sorry I was not up to the point, I am talking of current implementation of Aerogear scaffold of Forge.
>>> >
>>> > The question is: should Aerogear scaffold continue with Jackson or migrate to Errai?
>>> >
>>> > Thomas
>>> >
>>> > ----- Ursprüngliche Nachricht -----
>>> > Von: "Luca Masini"
>>> > Erhalten: 19.12.2012 13:03
>>> > An: "forge-dev List"
>>> >
>>> > Hi Thomas, I didn't understand very well the question in your poll.
>>> >
>>> > Anyway when you talk about the marshalling, do you mean an annotation that know how to manage how to serialize persistent collection ??
>>> >
>>> > In a way, are you talking about the problem that frameworks like Gilead try to solve ??
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > 2012/12/18 Thomas Frühbeck < fruehbeck at aon.at >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > during experiments extending a generated aerogear application I found that
>>> >   - the current integration of JSON via Jackson is kinda creative hack
>>> >   - not easily portable to recent releases of Jackson (see above)
>>> >   - does not make use of annotation driven UI/ser/deserializ. processing
>>> >
>>> > During my investigations on upgrade possibilities to modern Jackson I realized, that Errai is a very powerful and complete framework well worth being featured
>>> > in Forge's scaffold.
>>> > As I am not really deep into Jackson/JSON/Rest yet I would like to ask for your opinion on this.
>>> >
>>> > Another question regarding use of annotations in a scaffold:
>>> > Especially regarding modern Errai/Jackson annotations are an easy means to control the UI / (De-)Serialization, e.g. when working with entities, I think it is
>>> > necessary to use persistence-based entity instantiation before deserialization, to avoid loss of data if an incomplete entity is desrialized and persisted by
>>> > merge().
>>> >
>>> > Do you think it acceptable to actively insert annotations into entity code - possibly by a scaffold command like "scaffold applyAnnotations"?
>>> >
>>> > In my opinion this could provide interesting best practice propagation for novices like me.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Thomas
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > forge-dev mailing list
>>> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > ****************************************
>>> > http://www.lucamasini.net
>>> > http://twitter.com/lmasini
>>> > http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
>>> > ****************************************
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > forge-dev mailing list
>>> > forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-dev mailing list
>>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> ****************************************
>> http://www.lucamasini.net
>> http://twitter.com/lmasini
>> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/luca-masini/7/10/2b9
>> ****************************************
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-dev mailing list
>> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Lincoln Baxter, III
> http://ocpsoft.org
> "Simpler is better."
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20121221/7a0bddb4/attachment-0001.html