[forge-dev] automatic dependency detection too restrictive?

Lincoln Baxter, III lincolnbaxter at gmail.com
Wed Feb 15 10:03:54 EST 2012

I just had a thought. Are you sure that you really need the MVEL library?
Is it possible that you are directly referencing MVEL classes when you
should instead be referencing Seam Render classes?

"TemplateCompiler" comes to mind.

Just a thought?

Could you post your plugin code on github so that I can try to reproduce
this issue?


On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Thomas Frühbeck <fruehbeck at aon.at> wrote:

> Thank you for clarifying the issue, the build-repair-reload cycles have
> become tedious :-)
> > AFAICT, depending on seam-render and adjusting seam-render module
> definition to export the MVEL classes should take care of this (
> If I understood correctly the proposed solution would be to change
> forge/modules/org/jboss/seam/render/main/module.xml to
> <module xmlns="urn:jboss:module:1.0" name="org.jboss.seam.render">
> <resources>
> <resource-root path="seam-render-1.0.0.Alpha6.jar"/>
> </resources>
> <dependencies>
> <module name="javax.enterprise.api" />
> <module name="org.jboss.forge" />
> <module name="org.jboss.solder" />
> <module name="org.mvel" export="true"/>
> <module name="javax.api" />
> </dependencies>
> </module>
> I did that and it works!
> > if it's ever acceptable from a visibility perspective to depend on MVEL
> directly).
> Honestly, this sounds as if the old days of classloading problems come
> back :-/
> My two cents: if there is a clean solution keeping the classes hidden from
> the plugins it's OK.
> But if it is difficult to do I would prefer to accept visibility of such
> libraries of common utility - we are talking of _plugins_, there should be
> some initimacy allowed, isn't it?
> Regards,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev

Lincoln Baxter, III
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120215/8842c53a/attachment.html 

More information about the forge-dev mailing list