[forge-dev] Errai vs JDT, or?

[Lincoln Baxter, III]

If you want to do a Proof of Concept showing how we can use the Errai code
generation, I'd gladly consider it.

However, the decision to wrap the Eclipse API comes with several benefits,
not the least of which is basically free upgrades as the Java language
specification continues to evolve :)

~Lincoln

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ivan St. Ivanov
<ivan.st.ivanov at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Today at the meeting I asked whether we could use the Errai code
> generation APIs and not the ones from Eclipse. The reason for that was not
> that I am an Eclipse API hater (which I am ;-)), but because I hope that
> with Errai we will be able to solve problems more easily (it's a JBoss
> project and you know each other ;-)). By problems that we may need to be
> solved, I mean something like the discussion in this thread:
> http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/2011-December/001370.html
>
> Lincoln mentioned on the meeting that the purpose of the Errai API is
> different. However, I didn't get it. Why can't we use it instead of JDT?
>
> BTW, the JavaClassTest keeps failing on my Windows machine and Forge
> produces awfully formatted entities on this OS. :-(
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> forge-dev mailing list
> forge-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-dev
>
>


-- 
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-dev/attachments/20120301/9bdc47bb/attachment.html