[forge-users] And what about being able to generate methods ?

[George Gastaldi]

I think that makes sense. +1 to that

> Em 14/05/2014, às 19:31, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com> escreveu:
> 
> Hum... not sure about that. A jpa-new-method could bring lifecycle (e.g. @PostPersist, @PreRemove...), a cdi-new-method or ejb-new-method could bring lifecycle (@PostConstruct, @PreDestroy) or Interceptor, but java-new-method doesn't bring any of those (and I'm sure we could find other example, that's why I think we should keep them seperate)
> 
> 
> 2014-05-12 7:55 GMT+02:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:
>> It's just because in this case there isn't anything special about it. It will create a method and it doesn't matter if the target class is a specific component, but just a java class. In the case of jpa-new-field, the @Column annotation and other JPA stuff are added, so it makes sense to exist.
>> 
>>> Em 11/05/2014, às 18:31, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>> 
>> 
>>> Hum.... what are you saying by that ? No matter if I cd and Entity, an EJB, a REST endpoint I can go "java-new-method" and it will create a new method, no matter the component ? I thought anything related with JPA would be jpa-new-field, jpa-new-method... If not, why do we have jpa-new-field and not java-new-field ? Are you sure we would have a single java-new-method for everything ?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 2014-05-11 15:14 GMT+02:00 George Gastaldi <ggastald at redhat.com>:
>>>> I think it's a good idea. However I am not sure if it should be named "ejb-new-method", but rather "java-new-method". Can you JIRA it? This issue could also have a "Starter" label.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>>> Em 11/05/2014, às 06:58, Antonio Goncalves <antonio.mailing at gmail.com> escreveu:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> As you might know by now, I'm creating a Java EE 6 Advanced training course extensively using JBoss Forge. At one point, I create a set of EJBs.... and I need to create a few methods on each one. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I was wondering if it would make sense to have JBoss Forge generating methods ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Until now, Forge creates classes (e.g. jpa-new-entity, cdi-new-bean, java-new-class), annotations (cdi-new-qualifier, constraint-new-annotation...), attributes (jpa-new-field, java-new-field...) but nowhere Forge creates methods. This could make sense in most of the artifacts (EJBs, CDI bean, Java, but also JPA).
>>>>> 
>>>>> Do you think it would be good to have such functionnality ? 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Something like :
>>>>> 
>>>>> ejb-new-method --named findById --return org.agoncal.model.Author --parameters Long id
>>>>> ejb-new-method --named removeById --return void --parameters Long id
>>>>> ejb-new-method --named updateName --return org.agoncal.model.Author --parameters Long id, String name, String surname
>>>>> java-new-method --named doStuff --return String --parameters Integer p1, String p2, String p3
>>>>> 
>>>>> What do you think ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Antonio Goncalves 
>>>>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>>>> 
>>>>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> forge-users mailing list
>>>>> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> forge-users mailing list
>>>> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Antonio Goncalves 
>>> Software architect and Java Champion
>>> 
>>> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> forge-users mailing list
>>> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> forge-users mailing list
>> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Antonio Goncalves 
> Software architect and Java Champion
> 
> Web site | Twitter | LinkedIn | Paris JUG | Devoxx France
> _______________________________________________
> forge-users mailing list
> forge-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/forge-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/forge-users/attachments/20140514/cabec1ef/attachment.html