[Hawkular-dev] resteasy jackson or fasterxml jackson?

[Lucas Ponce]

I have never used the org.codehaus.jackson packages.

I always used the com.fasterxml.jackson.core ones in the context where I need to use directly the json library.

Wildfly 9 we have the 2.5.1 version there.

I tend to prefer the com.fasterxml and I remember to see that packages also in other components (that's main reason I used it).


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Burman" <miburman at redhat.com>
> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 8:47:20 AM
> Subject: Re: [Hawkular-dev] resteasy jackson or fasterxml jackson?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> They're basically the same software. org.fasterxml is just a newer version of
> Jackson. I'm surprised it's visible nearly anywhere.. resteasy-jackson2
> should use org.fasterxml?
> 
> http://wiki.fasterxml.com/JacksonRelease20
> 
> The change was done in 2012, org.codehaus stuff is from Jackson <2.0 and
> isn't maintained (only the 2.x is maintained). And since Wildfly ships with
> Jackson 2.4.1, I guess this is the version to go (and so does RESTeasy?
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RESTEASY-1100)
> 
>   - Micke
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Mazzitelli" <mazz at redhat.com>
> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 5:43:35 AM
> Subject: [Hawkular-dev] resteasy jackson or fasterxml jackson?
> 
> This is more for Lucas P, but wanted to put it out to the wider audience.
> 
> I'm playing with JSON stuff, and now that we are not using gson, we have to
> decide what jackson version we are going to use, because i just saw some
> oddities on stuff I'm building because of the two different impls that are
> available.
> 
> Are we going to use the restasy jackson2 or the fasterxml jackson artifacts?
> I think we need to consolidate on one (I mean, after all, we just got rid of
> gson - so we are trying to consolidate on one JSON impl). And they are
> technically two different impls because they are in two totally different
> Java packages and so look like two different impls. This can bite us if we
> aren't careful.
> 
> I'm using fasterxml right now. I don't know if i'm going down the exact same
> path that I did with gson (that is, using something no one else is). But my
> problem is I believe the resteasy modules are NOT in WildFly Core, so that's
> why I'm just pulling in the fasterxml artifacts directly rather than
> depending on the resteasy module.
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>