[Hawkular-dev] Inventory model change?

Jay Shaughnessy jshaughn at redhat.com
Fri Nov 13 09:11:18 EST 2015


re.

> Once we get to the point where we're feature complete we can and should think
> about API stability. At least with inventory we're not there by a long shot so
> I am not particularly willing to trade API clarity for "stability" of sub-par
> APIs that we produce and change as we go along.
>
> I'm not talking about changes for changes' sake but about substantial changes
> to the model that evolves as we iron out our usecases and workflows.
>
> While I 100% agree with you that we should communicate the changes and provide
> migration guide (if not automatic forwarding to new APIs where possible), I
> personally don't think we're at the point in the project's life where we can
> afford that burden. I personally don't have time to do that that wouldn't be
> better spent by burning some of the ever growing backlog of stuff to be done
> on inventory so that it can become at least partially usable by clients.


+1, we need to take advantage of this window where back compat is not 
overly required and use cases continue to become solidified.  Of course 
don't go ten steps back to go one step forward.  As with everything, 
make good trade-offs and don't hang out to dry the folks using your stuff.



More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list