[Hawkular-dev] communty distribution question

Juraci Paixão Kröhling jpkroehling at redhat.com
Fri Apr 29 08:57:41 EDT 2016


On 29.04.2016 14:49, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2016, at 13:41, Juraci Paixão Kröhling wrote:
>> In the end, what people will see after this 5 minutes test is not what
>> Hawkular is.
>
> So the clear suggestion and opinion here is to remove everything
> that is not absolutely required by the ManageIQ integration?

Might be, I don't know. Here we cycle back to the question about the 
purpose. What's Hawkular's purpose? If our purpose is to "provide 
Middleware management to ManageIQ", then why not. There are so many 
interesting things to be done at Middleware management that it's a shame 
we'd spend so much time on other non-core stuff...

- Juca.


More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list