[Hawkular-dev] Move to WF 10.1.0?

Matt Wringe mwringe at redhat.com
Fri Dec 16 16:06:40 EST 2016


----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jay Shaughnessy" <jshaughn at redhat.com>
> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Friday, 16 December, 2016 3:44:08 PM
> Subject: [Hawkular-dev] Move to WF 10.1.0?
> 
> 
> I noticed that on Openshift we are running Hawkular Metrics on WildFly
> 10.1.0. It was upped from 10.0.0 several months ago due to a blocking issue
> that had been fixed in EAP but not WF 10.0. I ran into a new issue when
> trying to deploy Metrics master on OS Origin. It failed to deploy on WF
> 10.1.0. I was able to solve the issue without a major change but it called
> out the fact that we are building Hawkular against WF 10.0.1 bom and running
> itests against 10.0.0 server.
> 
> Because OS is a primary target platform I'm wondering if we should bump the
> parent pom deps to the 10.1.0 bom and server (as well as upping a few
> related deps as well, like ISPN). As part of my investigation I did this
> locally for parent pom, commons, alerting and metrics and did not see any
> issues.
> 
> Thoughts?

We should as a policy be moving to newer Wildfly instances once they are available. Wildfly doesn't back port fixes.

For the OpenShift case, the issue we ran into was https://issues.jboss.org/browse/UNDERTOW-472 (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366018#c31). And it was serious enough that we updated our own image to the 10.1.0.CR1 instead of waiting for the official 10.1.0 images to be available.

In the future we should probably open jiras with Hawkular to make sure that we are more in sync.


More information about the hawkular-dev mailing list