[Hawkular-dev] Hawkular.org

[John Sanda]

> On Jul 5, 2016, at 10:21 AM, Thomas Segismont <tsegismo at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Le 05/07/2016 à 16:05, Stefan Negrea a écrit :
>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 8:03 AM, Thomas Segismont <tsegismo at redhat.com <mailto:tsegismo at redhat.com>
>> <mailto:tsegismo at redhat.com <mailto:tsegismo at redhat.com>>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>    Le 05/07/2016 à 14:59, Heiko W.Rupp a écrit :
>>>> 2) The Grafana plugin should be moved under Metrics because is for Metrics
>>>>> and only Metrics.
>>> If this is true - can we make it work with H-services as well?
>>> 
>> 
>>    The Grafana plugin works with all active flavors of Metrics: standalone,
>>    Openshift-Metrics and Hawkular-Services.
>> 
>>    I'm not sure what Stefan meant.
>> 
>> 
>> The Grafana plugins works with Metrics deployed on all distributions
>> however, the plugin itself can only be used with the Metrics project,
>> there are no projects (such as Alerts, or Inventory) that will ever
>> integrate with it. That is why I think it should be under the Metrics
>> project and not in another place. The integration itself is very
>> specific to just Metrics, not the entire Hawkular Services.
> 
> I see what you meant now. But we can't presume anything about other 
> services roadmaps. For example, the datasource plugin annotation feature 
> could be implemented with requests to an event service.
> 
> Anyway, since it should be able to connect to Metrics in different 
> environments (H-Services, OS-Metrics and standalone), I err on the side 
> of promoting it as a top level project.
> 

I think a top-level project makes the most sense.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160705/cd296b07/attachment.html