[Hawkular-dev] Hawkular-Archive - New Org

[Jiri Kremser]

Hi,
  I don't like the idea either. In a way, it's similar to "git push -f". If
you move the repo, there is no way how anyone can find out the new location.

I vote for some big note in the readme, that it's abandoned (if it was
really abandoned) for reason X and it's better to use repo Y because of Z.

"What if we realize we need to "unarchive" some project? I don't see that
happening but that would create even more confusion."

It's unlikely, but it actually happened with
https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-ui-components

jk

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Stefan Negrea <snegrea at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I would like to propose a new organization in Github to host projects that
> no longer receive development. "Hawkular-Archive" seems a good name for
> this purpose. The goal is to keep the main Hawkular org focused on
> important projects and at the same time preserve work that was already done
> but away from the main organization.
>
> From a quick look at the current organization here are two repositories
> that can be moved right away: hawkular-metrics-openshift  (Openshit 2.x
> cartridge for Hawkular Metrics 0.2.7 or earlier) and hawkular-bus (code
> moved to another repo). Am I am sure we can find other repositories to
> move.
>
> In the long run we can develop some criteria for archiving projects but
> for now we can just do a one-time major cleanup.
>
> Any repositories that should be archived right away? Any other suggestions
> for a name? Any thoughts on the idea in general?
>
>
> Thank you,
> Stefan Negrea
>
> Software Engineer
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20160505/40f7ec83/attachment.html