[Hawkular-dev] Future change in Inventory REST API - impacted clients?

[Joel Takvorian]

It looks good, too. As long as it's using the java api, it should be fine.

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Jay Shaughnessy <jshaughn at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Hi Joel,
>
> There are a couple of listeners in the services code that use inventory.
> I took a look and I think they are OK but you may want to make sure this
> like is OK:
>
> https://github.com/hawkular/hawkular-services/blob/master/
> hawkular-rest/hawkular-listener/src/main/java/org/hawkular/listener/cache/
> BackfillCacheManager.java#L397
>
>
> On 11/22/2016 4:26 AM, Joel Takvorian wrote:
>
> Gracias Lucas
>
> I'm going to try testing manageiq's middleware spec... will probably ask
> for some help :)
>
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Lucas Ponce <lponce at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Also, I mean a *live* test from middleware_*.spec to the new changes.
>>
>> ManageIQ uses recorded cassettes with old versions of Hawkular Services.
>>
>> Lucas
>>
>> ----- Mensaje original -----
>> > De: "Lucas Ponce" <lponce at redhat.com>
>> > Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development" <
>> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> > Enviados: Martes, 22 de Noviembre 2016 9:49:21
>> > Asunto: Re: [Hawkular-dev] Future change in Inventory REST API -
>> impacted        clients?
>> >
>> > I think that ruby test suite should be enough.
>> >
>> > But just in case, before to submit the change it could be good if
>> ManageIQ
>> > tests are passing.
>> >
>> > Some ManageIQ code use the wrapped json code brought by the ruby client.
>> >
>> > I guess that if the middleware_*.spec are passing we are fine.
>> >
>> > Lucas
>> >
>> > ----- Mensaje original -----
>> > > De: "Joel Takvorian" <jtakvori at redhat.com>
>> > > Para: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
>> > > <hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>> > > Enviados: Martes, 22 de Noviembre 2016 9:47:22
>> > > Asunto: [Hawkular-dev] Future change in Inventory REST API - impacted
>> > >     clients?
>> > >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > There is a small upcoming change in the Inventory REST API which
>> consists
>> > > in
>> > > removing a deprecated field, as explained in this JIRA:
>> > > https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HWKINVENT-200
>> > >
>> > > Basically, "type" has been replaced with "metricDataType" a while ago
>> and
>> > > made deprecated, now it's going to be removed. Probably not for the
>> next
>> > > release, but for the one after. Meanwhile I'd like to check any
>> existing
>> > > usage. What are the potential usages?
>> > >
>> > > - Ruby client: I've already made changes to it
>> > > - Java client: it uses the inventory API code, so it should not
>> require any
>> > > change
>> > > - Go client: does not use inventory (?)
>> > > - Python client: does not use inventory (?)
>> > > - I'm now having a look at WF & openshift agents
>> > >
>> > > Do you see anything else?
>> > >
>> > > Joel
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > hawkular-dev mailing list
>> > > hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > hawkular-dev mailing list
>> > hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> hawkular-dev mailing list
>> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing listhawkular-dev at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20161122/baf3bc14/attachment.html