[Hawkular-dev] open shift agent - what to call it?

[Jay Shaughnessy]

+1 to the verbose naming, it's totally clear if we just do it that way.

On 10/19/2016 9:39 AM, John Mazzitelli wrote:
>>> OK, so if we use Hawkular Kubernetes Agent then the gitrepo would be named:
>>>
>>> hawkular/hawkular-kubernetes-agent
>> Sounds good to me
> And the executable name? The name we call it in code and in logging messages?
>
> Based on what people are saying, I'm just going to call the executable "hawkular-kubernetes-agent" and have for example "hawkular-kubernetes-agent.go" and when logging needs to name it call it "Hawkular Kubernetes Agent"
>
> This is what I was getting at - I wasn't asking for the "product name" (we can call it anything we want and it doesn't affect me at this point in time :) but what are we to call it in the code, for logging messages, executable names, github repo, etc. I'm fine with "hawkular-kubernetes-agent" and everything that entails if that is what people want.
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/hawkular-dev/attachments/20161019/f269b103/attachment-0001.html