[Hawkular-dev] OpenShift: Metric table out of sync issue and heapster

[Matt Wringe]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Burman" <miburman at redhat.com>
> To: "Matt Wringe" <mwringe at redhat.com>, "Discussions around Hawkular development" <hawkular-dev at lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Saturday, 27 May, 2017 2:08:53 AM
> Subject: Re: OpenShift: Metric table out of sync issue and heapster
> 
> Hi,
> 
> That check is there because it greatly reduces the load on the
> Hawkular-Metrics in an existing environment. Otherwise, after the
> restart, the first time the metrics are sent it is going to make a huge
> amount of writes to HWKMETRICS and this will take time (the operations
> are slower than datapoint writes after all).

The majority (if not all) metrics in Hawkular Metrics right now come from Heapster, if things are working properly then they should essentially all have that 

> I'll make the change next week to allows deciding the behavior with a
> command line parameter (in case we fix it in the metrics some other way
> also - or this wasn't the real root cause for some reason).

I am fine with a command line parameter if we think this is the right way to go. As long as we provide some sort of mechanism to allow for users to resolve this issue.

> 
> 
> On 05/25/2017 01:24 AM, Matt Wringe wrote:
> > We are still running into issues on machines where the metric tables
> > getting out of sync bug has not been fixed for it yet
> > (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/HWKMETRICS-660).
> >
> > @miburman: would it be possible to update our Heapster sink to always
> > update metrics when its started? Eg to remove this check
> > https://github.com/kubernetes/heapster/blob/master/metrics/sinks/hawkular/client.go#L45
> >
> > I am not sure why we have that check in there in the first place, and I
> > think we should always just update the tag definition on each start. That
> > way if someone has run into the problem where the tags and metrics
> > definitions get out of sync, they can just restart heapster to get things
> > back working again.
> >
> > Any thoughts?
> >
> > - Matt
> 
>