[infinispan-dev] A better fix for Immutables

Jason T. Greene jason.greene at redhat.com
Tue Sep 8 17:19:58 EDT 2009


IMO it's not worth adding another dep for something that can be created 
in a few lines of code.

Jeff Ramsdale wrote:
> Yeah, I noticed the same thing. I was thinking of suggesting the use of 
> Google Collections, too: http://code.google.com/p/google-collections/
> 
> They provide a host of Immutable collections and many other handy 
> classes. Specifically, I thought BiMap could replace BidirectionalMap 
> (I've been working on implementing this, actually). The Google 
> Collections are very well tested (and widely deployed), vetted by Josh 
> Bloch, and may potentially make it into the JDK in time.
> 
> Great interview with the creators 
> here: http://www.javalobby.org/articles/google-collections/
> 
> -jeff
> 
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Krzysztof Sobolewski 
> <Krzysztof.Sobolewski at atm.com.pl 
> <mailto:Krzysztof.Sobolewski at atm.com.pl>> wrote:
> 
>     I noticed that there was a problem with generics in Immutables
>     class. May I
>     suggest a better approach? (patch attached) :)
> 
>     [AFAICS the same thing is needed for analogous code in JBoss Cache, BTW]
>     -KS
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     infinispan-dev mailing list
>     infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org <mailto:infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev


-- 
Jason T. Greene
JBoss, a division of Red Hat



More information about the infinispan-dev mailing list