[infinispan-dev] Bye bye wrappers, ComparingConcurrentHashMapv8 is here (ISPN-2281)

[Tristan Tarrant]

Didn't I just say exactly that ? I don't understand where we differ.

Tristan

On 03/20/2013 12:25 PM, Sanne Grinovero wrote:
> Why would you need to *store* anything which is equal for all entries?
> I'd have an interceptor "decorate" stuff with some constant additions;
> otherwise you could also think of reusing instances, like I had
> suggested a while back to change the Externalizer contract to allow it
> to be passed some context to make unique objects taking them from a
> pool.
>
> At least it looks like you would have to split such metadata: version
> for example needs to be maintained per entry, as will be vector
> clocks.
>
> Sanne
>
> On 20 March 2013 11:04, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 03/20/2013 11:51 AM, Manik Surtani wrote:
>>> On 18 Mar 2013, at 12:21, Galder Zamarreño <galder at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> IOW, you'll be able to say: create an Infinsipan Server that has String as key and value of type X, where X is the actual data type, no metadata!! The metadata (version, encoding, whatever is requried to fulfill the compatibility reqs in ISPN-2281) will be passed as part of the put/replace…etc (I will email this around when in place).
>>> Not sure I get this.  Where will this metadata be stored?
>> Metadata should be moved to the ICE-level, or the Cache-level (for
>> metadata common to all entries in the cache, to save space: e.g. if all
>> entries in my cache are text/plain)
>>
>> Tristan
>> _______________________________________________
>> infinispan-dev mailing list
>> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev