[infinispan-dev] minutes from the monitoring&management meeting

[Dan Berindei]

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Tristan Tarrant <ttarrant at redhat.com>
wrote:

> On 26/08/14 15:50, Dan Berindei wrote:
> >
> > The cluster registry also uses a clustered cache, how would we ship
> > the cache configuration around for that cache?
> Currently the configuration for the cluster registry is static, so there
> isn't any need to propagate it. My reasoning obviously falls over when
> we want to add some configuration to it, such as persistence.
>

Right, I was certain we already allowed the user to override the cluster
registry cache config.

Still, even if the configuration is static, I'm not a fan of adding yet
another special case for the cluster registry cache. So I'm not completely
sold on your idea yet :)


> >
> > The cluster registry is also too limited to do this check ATM, as it
> > doesn't support conditional operations. I'm not sure whether that's
> > because they just weren't needed, or it's an intentional limitation.
> >
> I think it was just laziness.
>
> Tristan
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20140827/2b4a6f84/attachment.html