[infinispan-dev] Store as binary

[Sanne Grinovero]

What's the point for these tests?
 On 20 Jan 2014 15:48, "Radim Vansa" <rvansa at redhat.com> wrote:

> OK, I have results for dist-udp-no-tx or local-no-tx modes on 8 nodes
> (in local mode the nodes don't communicate, naturally):
> Dist mode: 3 % down for reads, 1 % for writes
> Local mode: 19 % down for reads, 16 % for writes
>
> Details in [1], ^ is for both keys and values stored as binary.
>
> Radim
>
> [1]
>
> https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/job/jdg-radargun-perf-store-as-binary/4/artifact/report/All_report.html
>
> On 01/20/2014 11:14 AM, Pedro Ruivo wrote:
> >
> > On 01/20/2014 10:07 AM, Mircea Markus wrote:
> >> Would be interesting to see as well, though performance figure would
> not include the network latency, hence it would not tell much about the
> benefit of using this on a real life system.
> > that's my point. I'm interested to see the worst scenario since all
> > other cluster modes, will have a lower (or none) impact in performance.
> >
> > Of course, the best scenario would be only each node have access to
> > remote keys...
> >
> > Pedro
> >
> >> On Jan 20, 2014, at 9:48 AM, Pedro Ruivo <pedro at infinispan.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> IMO, we should try the worst scenario: Local Mode + Single thread.
> >>>
> >>> this will show us the highest impact in performance.
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > infinispan-dev mailing list
> > infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
>
> --
> Radim Vansa <rvansa at redhat.com>
> JBoss DataGrid QA
>
> _______________________________________________
> infinispan-dev mailing list
> infinispan-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/infinispan-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/attachments/20140121/1f4bc558/attachment.html