[jboss-as7-dev] JBOSS_HOME/client in AS7 for client accessible jars

[Andrig Miller]

One of the nice things about the current AS 7 distribution is there aren't duplicated jars all over the place. 

Would it be better to just divy up the modules directory into the public vs. private API's, which I understood we needed to do anyway (or something to that affect) to meet our TAG/Andiamo requirements anyway. 

Also, is calling this stuff "client" really appropriate? Isn't it really just the public API's? 

Andy 

----- Original Message -----

> From: "David M. Lloyd" <david.lloyd at redhat.com>
> To: jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:51:03 AM
> Subject: Re: [jboss-as7-dev] JBOSS_HOME/client in AS7 for client
> accessible jars

> On 06/14/2011 03:26 AM, Jaikiran Pai wrote:
> > I've been seeing many users asking how to add the Java EE (and
> > other
> > client accessible) jars to their classpath while developing against
> > AS7:
> [...]
> > Thoughts? If no one has any objection, can this branch
> > https://github.com/jaikiran/jboss-as/commits/client-lib be pulled
> > upstream please?

> For client purposes I really think we should have simpler JAR names
> than
> this, maybe based on module name. For example
> "jboss-ejb-api_3.1_spec-1.0.0.Final.jar" could be
> "javax_ejb_api.jar".

> Or perhaps we should use an aggregated javaee.jar. Either way I don't
> like just piling these JARs into the client folder unmodified.

> And there will be other client JARs we need too like Remoting, DMR,
> and
> the controller-client JAR.
> --
> - DML
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-as7-dev mailing list
> jboss-as7-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-as7-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-as7-dev/attachments/20110614/dbd8ba87/attachment.html