[jboss-cluster-dev] JGroups configurations in JBoss AS 5

[Manik Surtani]

Yes, but it relies on an open stream between the 2 instances.  State  
is written without a flush, and then a marker is placed on the stream  
asking the state requester to start a partial flush so that the final  
tx log can be written to the stream as well.

cc'ing Jason since I realise he is not on the jboss-cluster-dev mail  
list.

On 24 Feb 2009, at 16:18, Bela Ban wrote:

> Why does it require STREAMING_STATE_TRANSFER ? Doesn't it just call  
> JChannel.getState() ?
>
> Manik Surtani wrote:
>> I noticed that the JGroups configs in JBoss AS 5.0.0 and 5.0.1 uses  
>> STATE_TRANSFER as opposed to STREAMING_STATE_TRANSFER.  Is there  
>> any reason for this default?
>>
>> The reason I ask is that non-blocking state transfer in JBoss Cache  
>> 3.1.0 requires STREAMING_STATE_TRANSFER to work and I was wondering  
>> whether this may cause other issues elsewhere in the AS.
>>
>> Cheers
>> -- 
>> Manik Surtani
>> Lead, JBoss Cache
>> http://www.jbosscache.org
>> manik at jboss.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-cluster-dev mailing list
>> jboss-cluster-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-cluster-dev
>>
>
> -- 
> Bela Ban
> Lead JGroups / Clustering Team
> JBoss - a division of Red Hat
>

--
Manik Surtani
Lead, JBoss Cache
http://www.jbosscache.org
manik at jboss.org




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/jboss-cluster-dev/attachments/20090224/ff36fde8/attachment.html