[jboss-dev] [Fwd: Re: Beta3 status] - please reply

Dimitris Andreadis dandread at redhat.com
Thu Dec 20 12:52:30 EST 2007


Forwarding to jboss-dev as it seems most people missed it.

=========================================================

I've applied the tag but there are some things I want to clarify before actually releasing:
https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/tags/JBoss_5_0_0_Beta3/

- Ales & Pete (after a long long night) are done with the Seam tests. They report however
that Seam is dog slow on AS5.
- Alexey had some minor issues with the templates (done now?)
- The testsuite looks pretty good

I've triggered the tck5 runs last night and they show regressions in the following:

http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-ejb30/
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-saaj/
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-j2eetools/
http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-jaxws/

I don't really understand why those would come up and whether those results are reliable so
I triggered more runs to verify. Can the respective owners take a look (EJB3 and WS).

I've also asked Rajesh to setup a JBossWS-2.0.2.GA-testsuite-AS5.0.x build but we couldn't
get this to work, the testsuite wouldn't compile since some of the jars are moved around.

Can this be fixed or what is the proper runs to look for, on jbossws' own hudson server?

http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/view/AS%20Tests/

/Dimitris

Scott M Stark wrote:
> The run that picks up mc 2.0.0.beta9, the juddi rollback, etc is done
> and looks good. Time to tag.
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-TestSuite-sun15/256/


-- 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dimitris Andreadis
JBoss AS, Project Lead
JBoss, a Division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

http://dandreadis.blogspot.com/



More information about the jboss-development mailing list