[jboss-dev] Re: [Fwd: Re: Beta3 status] - please reply

[Alexey Loubyansky]

 > - Alexey had some minor issues with the templates (done now?)

Finishing. They are not minor though.

Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> Forwarding to jboss-dev as it seems most people missed it.
> 
> =========================================================
> 
> I've applied the tag but there are some things I want to clarify before 
> actually releasing:
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/tags/JBoss_5_0_0_Beta3/
> 
> - Ales & Pete (after a long long night) are done with the Seam tests. 
> They report however
> that Seam is dog slow on AS5.
> - Alexey had some minor issues with the templates (done now?)
> - The testsuite looks pretty good
> 
> I've triggered the tck5 runs last night and they show regressions in the 
> following:
> 
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-ejb30/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-saaj/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-j2eetools/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-jaxws/
> 
> I don't really understand why those would come up and whether those 
> results are reliable so
> I triggered more runs to verify. Can the respective owners take a look 
> (EJB3 and WS).
> 
> I've also asked Rajesh to setup a JBossWS-2.0.2.GA-testsuite-AS5.0.x 
> build but we couldn't
> get this to work, the testsuite wouldn't compile since some of the jars 
> are moved around.
> 
> Can this be fixed or what is the proper runs to look for, on jbossws' 
> own hudson server?
> 
> http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/view/AS%20Tests/
> 
> /Dimitris
> 
> Scott M Stark wrote:
>> The run that picks up mc 2.0.0.beta9, the juddi rollback, etc is done
>> and looks good. Time to tag.
>> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/job/JBoss-AS-5.0.x-TestSuite-sun15/256/
> 
>