[jboss-dev] Re: Beta3 status

[Scott M Stark]

The current tck5-j2eetools, tck5-saaj runs are back to 0 failures.
tck5-ejb30 amd tck5-jaxws are still way up in the error rates. I'm
looking at some of the ejb3 regressions.

Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> I've applied the tag but there are some thing I want to clarify:
> https://svn.jboss.org/repos/jbossas/tags/JBoss_5_0_0_Beta3/
> 
> - Ales & Pete (after a long long night) are done with the Seam tests.
> They report however that Seam is dog slow on AS5.
> - Alexey had some minor issues with the templates (done now?)
> - The testsuite looks pretty good
> 
> I've triggered the tck5 runs last night and they show regressions in the
> following:
> 
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-ejb30/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-saaj/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-j2eetools/
> http://hudson.qa.jboss.com/hudson/view/TCK5/job/tck5-jaxws/
> 
> I don't really understand why those would come up and whether those
> results are reliable so I triggered more runs to verify. Can the
> respective owners take a look (EJB3 and WS).
> 
> I've also asked Rajesh to setup a JBossWS-2.0.2.GA-testsuite-AS5.0.x
> build but we couldn't get this to work, the testsuite wouldn't compile
> since some of the jars are moved around.
> 
> Can this be fixed or what is the proper runs to look for, on jbossws'
> own hudson server?
> 
> http://jbws.dyndns.org:8180/hudson/view/AS%20Tests/
> 
> /Dimitris
>