[jboss-dev] The JBoss Retro 1.1.2 mystery

[Kabir Khan]

AOP 2.0.0.alpha1, 2.0.0.beta1 and 2.0.0.beta2 depend on this.

I think it was Paul's idea to put it under org/jboss. I have reinstated 
org/jboss/jboss-retro/1.1.2 in the repository, so my old builds still 
work and updated aop trunk to reference jboss/jboss-retro/1.1.2

Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
> This is the move, but as Scott said org/jboss was not used in the old 
> repository, so maybe we should just do a copy. What depends on the old 
> location?
> 
> ---
> 
> Author: thomas.diesler at jboss.com
> Date: 2007-11-01 04:02:14 -0400 (Thu, 01 Nov 2007)
> New Revision: 1739
> 
> Added:
>    jboss/jboss-retro/
> Removed:
>    org/jboss/jboss-retro/
> Log:
> Move jboss-retro
> 
> Copied: jboss/jboss-retro (from rev 1738, org/jboss/jboss-retro)
> 
> Scott M Stark wrote:
>> I don't know why anything would be under org/jboss in the legacy
>> repository. I don't see anything there. Such content should be under the
>> maven2 repo (http://repository.jboss.org/maven2), and I do see this
>> version there:
>>
>> http://repository.jboss.org/maven2/org/jboss/jboss-retro/
>>
>>
>> Kabir Khan wrote:
>>> It used to be here:
>>> http://repository.jboss.org/org/jboss/jboss-retro/1.1.2/component-info.xml 
>>>
>>> It has suddenly been removed so the aop build fails.
>>>
>>> AOP 2.0.0.beta2 (and maybe older versions, haven't checked) used this
>>> version so how can we have reproducible builds if things like this keep
>>> disappearing/being moved?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-development mailing list
>> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development
> _______________________________________________
> jboss-development mailing list
> jboss-development at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-development

-- 
Kabir Khan
JBoss AOP Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat