[jboss-rpm] JBoss AS submitted for review

Itamar Heim iheim at redhat.com
Thu Apr 5 05:43:38 EDT 2012


On 04/05/2012 12:43 PM, Carlo de Wolf wrote:
> Shouldn't it install its own user, instead of piggy backing on jboss-as?

I assume it is an option if that user is in the jbossas group.
but at least until today, we re-used the jboss service itself, rather 
than deploy another one.
question is how easy it is to re-use the jbossas service code, but with 
another user.

>
> Carlo
>
> On 04/05/2012 11:33 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote:
>>
>> On 04/05/2012 07:53 AM, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2012 01:03 AM, Marek Goldmann wrote:
>>>> Great news!
>>>>
>>>> The jboss-as package was just approved. What does it mean? Expect to
>>>> have initial packages of JBoss AS in Fedora... *tomorrow*!
>>> great news - thanks to all involved!
>>> Juan - can we now get ovirt-engine submitted/approved or still have open
>>> items?
>> Itamar,
>>
>> ovirt-engine is submitted for review since 26th March:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807017
>>
>> Assuming that it'll be approved soon - this doesn't mean that it'll work
>> properly from day 0, there is still a lot of things to discuss on how we
>> want to integrate it with the just approved jboss-as package.
>>
>> Most probably this will include changes on both sides.
>>
>> --Marek
>> _______________________________________________
>> jboss-rpm mailing list
>> jboss-rpm at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jboss-rpm
>



More information about the jboss-rpm mailing list